Friday, December 11, 2015

How-to IFRS Series..(2/5)

How-to- Determine
Operating Segments tell the full story of an Entity
OVERVIEW
Just a compliance activity is what Segment reporting is understood by the financial reporting teams across geographies. This undermines its importance and hence is at most times overlooked by the senior management and audit committees.
In this article, I plan to take you through a short journey to the key requirements of ‘Operating Segments’ – IFRS 8. The entire article will keep its focus on How-to discern the importance of segment reporting in narrating the full story of an entity.
WHY IFRS 8 is IMPORTANT?

When an entity becomes large, it becomes important to understand how they operate. Almost all information contained in consolidated financial statements is focused on providing users with the financial position and performance of the entity as a whole. This information is useful but it seldom tells the full story. How do we know? When we read an earnings guidance by a large entity we get an understanding of how they function in different markets, with different products and services and its major clients, or capital expenditure for a budding division. Any one of these shows that the business is typically managed at a level lower than the consolidated entity. It is at this level that investors want detailed financial information. Different segments will generate dissimilar streams of cash flows, to which are attached disparate risks and which bring about unique values. Thus, without disaggregation, there is no sensible way to predict the overall amounts, timing, or risks of a complete undertaking’s future cash flows. Investors want to see the business through the eyes of management.

OPERATING SEGMENTS

Operating segments are components of an entity whose separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.



Let’s look at the four key elements in determining the operating segments:
*      Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM): may be an individual or a committee, depending on the entity. It is a function that allocates resources to, and assesses the performance of, the operating segments. The position of a person is not relevant as long as the person is responsible for strategic decision of the segments. Some examples include the CEO, the COO, the executive committee or the board of directors.
*      Business Activities: must be capable of earning revenue and/or incurring expenses for consideration of separate operating segments. The lack of any revenue and/or expense being allocated to a division does not exclude it from being a separate operating segment. Example a cost centres in an entity may not record the revenue separately as sales are not allocated on that basis. If discrete financial information is prepared and reviewed by the CODM, such cost centres would be considered as separate operating segments
*      Discrete Financial Information: is a judgemental area and will depend on the entity. If the CODM has sufficient information to assess the performance and allocate the resources for the business activities – it will qualify as discrete financial information. A set of financial statements is not required to identify operating segments.  The information can be met with operating performance information only, such as gross profit by product line or operating profit by region.
*      Reviewed by CODM regularly: In simple hierarchy entities information which is in standard monthly financial reporting pack provided to the CEO or board –if it is not CODM. Entities with matrix-style or overlapping reporting might have to consider the factors provided in IFRS 8:
1.    The nature of business activities of each component;
2.    The existence of managers responsible for each component; and
3.    The information provided to the board – when board is not the CODM.
For example, assume that the CODM reviews two sets of operating results – one by major product line and the other by geographical region. If we consider the above 3 factors in this situation we can draw a conclusion that one set of operating results will have more prominence in the internal reporting as compared to the other set. It is observed from practice that there are any few cases where operating segments lack clarity, even after the factors are considered.
REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
They are the basis for disclosure of segment reporting in the financial statements, and they can comprise single operating segments or an aggregation of operating segments.
The steps in the process of determining reportable segments is explained as under:
*      Aggregation: Two or more operating segments may be aggregated into a single operating segment if they have similar economic characteristics, and the segments are similar in each of the following respects:
1.     the nature of the products and services;
2.    the nature of production processes;
3.    the type of client for their products or services;
4.    the methods used to distribute their products or provide the services
5.    the nature of regulatory environment – e.g. Pharma or Banking

*    Quantitative Thresholds: An entity shall report separately information about an operating segment that meets any of the following quantitative thresholds:
1.    Its reported revenue, including both sales to external clients and intersegment sales or transfers, is 10% or more of the combined revenue, internal and external, of all operating segments;
2.    the absolute amount of its reported profit or loss is 10% or more of the greater, in absolute amount, of :
a.     the combined reported profit of all operating segments that did not report a loss and
b.    the combined reported loss of all operating segments that reported a loss.
3.    its assets are 10% or more of the combined assets of all operating segmnts.
Operating segments that do not meet any of the quantitative thresholds may be considered reportable, and separately disclosed, if management believes that information about the segment would be useful to users.

If any of the identified operating segments or aggregated groups of operating segments have similar economic characteristics and meet a majority of the aggregation criteria - then aggregate them and treat as reportable segments. Individual operating segments can also be treated as reportable segments, even if they are not aggregated with another segment or do not meet the quantitative threshold. 

Thursday, November 19, 2015

How-to IFRS Series..(1/5)


PURPOSE
I propose to start series of articles on How-to in IFRS? Some of it comes from my working experience at foreign banks and the Big 4 and some from my teaching notes at the IFRS certification courses. Hope you will enjoy the read..!! Happy reading :)
How-to
Know your Related Parties?

OVERVIEW
Related party transactions (RPT) are a very common in business nowadays. They are often assumed to be not a good thing. Though this may be true is some corporate scams where the board of directors and promoters take shareholders for a ride, in most cases there are valid commercial reasons for dealing with related parties.
The Companies Act, 2013 in India comprehensively provides guidance on the related parties which is not a part of this article. I expressly only write about how to know your related party according to IAS 24.
WHO IS ENTITY’S RELATED PARTY?

A party is related to an entity, if the party:
1.    is controlled by the entity, or controls the entity (including common control, joint control, significant influence);
2.    is an associate of the entity;
3.    is a joint venture;
4.    is a member of key management personnel of the entity
5.    is a close member of the family of any individual in (1) or (4)
6.    is an entity jointly controlled or significantly influenced by any individual in (4) or (5)
7.    is a post-employment benefit plan for the benefit of employees of the entity or a related party of the entity   


FEW MORE TIT-BITS
*  Key management personnel include all those who have authority and responsibility for planning, directing, and controlling the activities of an entity. These persons need not necessarily be directors.
*      Close members of the family definition provides a list of persons included in the family as:
o   Domestic partner
o   Children
o   Children of domestic partner
o   Dependants
o   Dependants of domestic partner
It is an inclusive definition but by no means the list is exhaustive. The
definition tries to address cross-border and cross-cultural dimension 
issues as far as possible.
WHAT TO DISCLOSE?
§        Regardless of the existence of related party transactions, we have to disclose the following:
a.     Relationships between parents and subsidiaries
b.    If control exists, such a relationship
c.     Key management personnel compensation in total plus short-term benefits, post-employment benefits, other long term benefits, termination benefits and share based payments
§         Minimum disclosures for RPT:
a.     Transaction amount
b.    Outstanding Balances
c.     Doubtful debt provisions for outstanding balances and expenses recognised
§       Disclosure categories
The above disclosures are required for each of the category listed under:
a.     Parent
b.    Entities with joint control or significant influence over the entity
c.     Subsidiaries
d.    Associates
e.     Joint ventures
f.      Key management personnel
g.     Other related parties
LET’S KNOW HOW-TO WITH CASE EXAMPLE

Facts: CureMe Pharma Ltd is a large MNC operating from India and is known to properly disclose all its related party transactions in the financial statements prepare under IFRS. The company is seeking advice from IFRS specialists on which of the transactions and to what extent be reported, and how the notes to accounts should appear.
1.    Remuneration and other payments made to CEO Mr. Gupta during the year 2014-15 were:
a.     Annual salary of 5 crores (including contribution to employee provident fund of 1 crore)
b.    Share options and other share based payments of 1 crore
c.     Reimbursement of his travel expenses for business amounting to 12 lakhs
2.    Sales made during the year 2014-15 to:
a.     LifeMe Pharma Ltd., parent company: 50 crores
b.    BeingMe Pharma Marketing Ltd., an associate: 2.5 crores
3.    Trade receivables at March 31, 2015, include:
a.     Due from LifeMe Pharma Ltd. 10 crores (net of provisions 7 crores)
b.    Due from BeingMe Pharma Marketing Ltd. 50 lakhs (these receivables are fully backed by corporate guarantee from BeingMe)
Solution:
      I.   All the above mentioned transactions are required to be disclosed in CureMe Pharma Ltd.’s financial statements prepared under IFRS.
The only exception is the reimbursement of the travel expenses of the CEO amounting to 12 lakhs; as this is not KMP compensation.

    II.          Notes to Accounts – Extract – Related Party Transactions
1)    CureMe Pharma Ltd., enters into related party transactions in the normal course of business. During the year 2014-15, these transactions were entered into with related parties as defined under IAS 24. The transactions resulted in balances due from those parties that, at March 31, 2015, were:
i)     With the parent company (LifeMe Pharma Ltd.)
a.   Sales = INR 50 crores
b.  Trade Receivables due from parent company = INR 10 crores
c.   Provision for doubtful debts = INR 3 crores  
ii)   With an associate
a.   Sales = INR 2.5 crores
b.  Included in trade receivables due from an associate * INR 50 lakhs
*Amount due from an associate is secured by a corporate guarantee given by the associate.
iii)  For the year ended March 31, 2015, the following payments were made to its CEO Mr. Gupta, part of the key management personnel:
a.   Short term benefits (Salary) = INR 4 crores
b.   Post-employment benefits (employee provident fund contribution) = 1 crore
c.   Share based payments including ESOP = 1 crore
d.  Total = INR 6 crores

Friday, February 20, 2015

IFRS 9 (Ind AS 109) - India first country to mandatorily early converge!!


Image result for companies rules

Abstract of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Notification - Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 

Effective from: 1-April-2015




Obligation to comply with Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS)
  1. The Companies and their auditors shall comply with the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) specified in Annexure (39 standards in total) to these rules in preparation of their financial statements and audit respectively, in the following manner, namely:- 
    • any company may comply with the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) for financial statements for accounting periods beginning on or after 1st April, 2015, with the comparatives for the periods ending on 31st March, 2015, or thereafter; 

    • the following companies shall comply with the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) for the accounting periods beginning on or after 1st April, 2016, with the comparatives for the periods ending on 31st March, 2016, or thereafter, namely:- 
      a) companies whose equity or debt securities are listed or are in the process of being listed on any stock exchange in India or outside India and having net worth of rupees five hundred crore or more; 
      b) companies other than those covered by sub-clause (a) and having net worth of Rupees five hundred crore or more;
      c) holding, subsidiary, joint venture or associate companies of companies covered by sub-clause (a) and sub-clause (b) as the case may be; and 

    • the following companies shall comply with the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) for the accounting periods beginning on or after 1 st April, 2017, with the comparatives for the periods ending on 31st March, 2017, or thereafter, namely:-
      a) companies whose equity or debt securities are listed or are in the process of being listed on any stock exchange in India or outside India and having net worth of less than Rupees five hundred crore;
      b) Unlisted companies having net worth of Rupees two hundred and fifty crore or more but less than rupees five hundred crore;
      c) holding, subsidiary, joint venture or associate companies of companies covered under sub-clause (a) and sub-clause (b), as the case may be.

“Comparatives” shall mean comparative figures for the preceding accounting period. 

For the purposes of calculation of net worth of companies, the following principles shall apply, namely:- 
the net worth shall be calculated in accordance with the stand-alone financial statements of the company as on 31st March, 2014 or the first audited financial statements for accounting period which ends after that date; 

Standards in Annexure to the rules once required to be complied with in accordance with these rules, shall apply to both stand-alone financial statements and consolidated financial statements.

Exemptions 
  • The insurance companies, banking companies and non-banking finance companies shall not be required to apply Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) for preparation of their financial statements either voluntarily or mandatorily.